<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Science Media Centre &#187; Lord Drayson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencemediacentre.co.nz/tag/lord-drayson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencemediacentre.co.nz</link>
	<description>Our aim is to promote accuarate, bias-free reporting on science and technology by helping the media work more closely with the scientific community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:26:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Science reporting: Goldacre vs Drayson</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencemediacentre.co.nz/2009/09/17/science-reporting-goldacre-vs-drayson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sciencemediacentre.co.nz/2009/09/17/science-reporting-goldacre-vs-drayson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Griffin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord Drayson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencemediacentre.co.nz/?p=4016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Last night in London, Dr Ben Goldacre debated with Lord Drayson the state of science reporting in Britain.
Dr Ben Goldacre is author of the book (and column) Bad Science, and has become well-known for criticising science reporting in the UK.  His debating opponent, Lord Drayson, is the UK&#8217;s Science Minister, who contends that the standard is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencemediacentre.co.nz%2F2009%2F09%2F17%2Fscience-reporting-goldacre-vs-drayson%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencemediacentre.co.nz%2F2009%2F09%2F17%2Fscience-reporting-goldacre-vs-drayson%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><strong>Last night in London, Dr Ben Goldacre debated with Lord Drayson the state of science reporting in Britain.</strong></p>
<p>Dr Ben Goldacre is author of the book (and column) <a href="http://www.badscience.net">Bad Science</a>, and has become well-known for criticising science reporting in the UK.  His debating opponent, Lord Drayson, is the UK&#8217;s Science Minister, who contends that the standard is actually quite high, and has greatly improved over the years.</p>
<p>The debate, which promised to be lively, was streamed live on Thursday night &#8211; a taster of it can be listened to <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8258000/8258355.stm">here</a>. The video of the full debate is also available, and can be seen <a href="http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/webcast.html">here</a>.</p>
<p>Since the debate, Lord Drayson, who defended science reporting against Goldacre&#8217;s criticisms, has promised to investigate any cases brought to him by scientists who feel they have been mispresented in the press.  The full article about the debate, written by Zoe Corbyn of the Times Higher Education Supplement, can be found <a href="http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&amp;storycode=408272&amp;c=2">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sciencemediacentre.co.nz/2009/09/17/science-reporting-goldacre-vs-drayson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
