<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The threat to science publishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencemediacentre.co.nz/2009/08/24/the-threat-to-science-publishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencemediacentre.co.nz/2009/08/24/the-threat-to-science-publishing/</link>
	<description>Our aim is to promote accurate, evidence-based reporting on science and technology by helping the media work more closely with the scientific community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 23:19:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: On electric fish, molecules and behaviour &#124; Building Blogs of Science</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencemediacentre.co.nz/2009/08/24/the-threat-to-science-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-17052</link>
		<dc:creator>On electric fish, molecules and behaviour &#124; Building Blogs of Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencemediacentre.co.nz/?p=3663#comment-17052</guid>
		<description>[...] Stod­dard and Zakon that was pub­lished in PLoS Biol­ogy 7(9): e1000203 thanks to the magic of Open Access. (Or you can read the briefer com­men­tary by For­tune and Chacron [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stod­dard and Zakon that was pub­lished in PLoS Biol­ogy 7(9): e1000203 thanks to the magic of Open Access. (Or you can read the briefer com­men­tary by For­tune and Chacron [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On electric fish, molecules and behaviour &#171; Building Blogs of Science</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencemediacentre.co.nz/2009/08/24/the-threat-to-science-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-16926</link>
		<dc:creator>On electric fish, molecules and behaviour &#171; Building Blogs of Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencemediacentre.co.nz/?p=3663#comment-16926</guid>
		<description>[...] Stoddard and Zakon that was published in PLoS Biology 7(9): e1000203 thanks to the magic of Open Access. (Or you can read the briefer commentary by Fortune and Chacron [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stoddard and Zakon that was published in PLoS Biology 7(9): e1000203 thanks to the magic of Open Access. (Or you can read the briefer commentary by Fortune and Chacron [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabiana Kubke</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencemediacentre.co.nz/2009/08/24/the-threat-to-science-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-12756</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabiana Kubke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencemediacentre.co.nz/?p=3663#comment-12756</guid>
		<description>This is a great post, thank you for providing such a well balanced view of the issue. 

A list of OA mandates for different countries can be found here: http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/policysignup/. The list is interesting in that NZ has a single open access mandate associated with theses at the University of Canterbury, and no mandates from the Funding bodies. (directed to this by Peter Suber)

As for the role of impact factor in career development, a recent statement was made by the International Respiratory Journal Editors (behind a paywall: http://ajrcmb.atsjournals.org/cgi/content/full/41/2/127) that &quot;the impact factor calculated for individual journals should not be used as a basis for evaluating the significance of an individual scientist&#039;s past performance or scientific potential&quot;. (link via Peter Binfield /Bora Zivkovic)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post, thank you for providing such a well balanced view of the issue. </p>
<p>A list of OA mandates for different countries can be found here: <a href="http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/policysignup/" rel="nofollow">http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/policysignup/</a>. The list is interesting in that NZ has a single open access mandate associated with theses at the University of Canterbury, and no mandates from the Funding bodies. (directed to this by Peter Suber)</p>
<p>As for the role of impact factor in career development, a recent statement was made by the International Respiratory Journal Editors (behind a paywall: <a href="http://ajrcmb.atsjournals.org/cgi/content/full/41/2/127" rel="nofollow">http://ajrcmb.atsjournals.org/cgi/content/full/41/2/127</a>) that &#8220;the impact factor calculated for individual journals should not be used as a basis for evaluating the significance of an individual scientist&#8217;s past performance or scientific potential&#8221;. (link via Peter Binfield /Bora Zivkovic)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

